24 Aug
2011
24 Aug
'11
9:24 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2011-08-24 07:32, Richie Cyngler wrote:
I don't get why no one is talking about reducing the signal level before dac~?
because we are talking about a safety net here.
everything done before the [dac~], you can easily circumvent within the patch (consciously or - more likely and dangerous - unconsciously) while happily patching away, making such provisions void (and blasting your ears)
fgmasdr IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk5UpxsACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvS6KgCgpjhEQHwOmHGSv6gCYz4az8ct
2QUAoLneNbeBGpH3ev8XRPZY7ZIUi7oP
=NoMB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----