22 Jul
2002
22 Jul
'02
9:15 p.m.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, CK wrote:
hi,
I read:
it isnt so at the moment, but it could be done this way.
I don't think so since ... . .
There isnt too much memory allocation, live patching being the most problematic case (but loosing this feature would be really bad).
which requires abstraction loading
you are right, didnt think of that. Probably it is possible to load a patch in another thread and hook it into the system when it is done ?
Guenter