On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 09:46 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2017-01-15 22:58, Miller Puckette wrote:
I can't understand what is wrong... if you 'stop' a line~ and then later give it a new target, it ramps form the position it had stoped at. I think this is the most reasonable behavior. Or is it doing something different somehow?
Before I create more confusion, let's focus on the ~ . I suspect [line] to be buggy, not [line~]. I only mentioned [line~] as a reference and since [line~] is doing what we agree it should do, I believe the behavior of [line] is buggy.
it starts from the original position, rather than the current one.
that is: if i stop a [0, 1 1000( after 999ms, the current position is something like 0.999. however, if i then send it a [0 1000( i will start from 0 (does effectively not doing anything, as it ramps from 0 to 0)!
i would have expected it to start from 0.999 (or somewhere close to) and ramp down.
Yes, that is the current behavior with [line]. I guess Miller was looking at [line~].
I'm sorry for not having been more clear in my second mail.
Roman