--- On Thu, 4/15/10, Phil Stone pkstone@ucdavis.edu wrote:
From: Phil Stone pkstone@ucdavis.edu Subject: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd? To: "PD list" pd-list@iem.at Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010, 7:49 PM In addition to disagreeing vehemently with your main point (Pd is good for little more than experimentation), I find this a piss-poor acid test for "music that sounds good":
colet.patrice@free.fr wrote:
there is no such project that show how pd is cool to
make people moving on the dance floor.
Phil- I dig music with compelling sounds, and I generally feel the urge to move my body to music I dig. One can use whatever test one wants to hold up some music as "genuine," and the question "does it draw people out onto the dance floor?" is just as valid as any other in this regard.
But then if the point of the acid test is to demonstrate the strengths
of a visual programming paradigm for the rapid implementation of various
dsp techniques to generate music, I'd say the OP's test is quite a fitting
and effective "Hello World" for Pd.
-Jonathan
Phil Stone www.pkstonemusic.com
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list