On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 17:49 +0200, Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi all, i'm a bit surprised that i haven't found anything in the archives, so
what is the reason that the period of metro can't be lower than 1 ms?
(it's limited in the source code). If it's a security thing, so that it prevents cpu overload it should
at least be much lower (or even better, just > 0). gr~~~
i am pretty sure, it has been discussed already. though, i am not sure, if ever anyone came up with a good reason for that behavour. to me as well, it seems to be a pretty arbitrary choice. ([until] shouldn't exist, if cpu usage, respectively turning pd unusable, is considered an issue).
after all, you could make your own [micrometro] abstraction based on [del], which hasn't such a built-in limit.
roman
___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de