I agree avoiding horizontal connections is good. the 5% of the time
when segmented patch cord are useful is when you need to take a patch
cord from the bottom to the top of a patch to make a loop.
.hc
On Feb 19, 2011, at 4:12 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
How can you say that segmented patch cords are bad 95% of the time
when they are not even available in Pd 100% of the time?Just to take Miller's "Techniques" as an example, if there were
segmented patch cords then all of his horizontal connections could
be made unambiguous by having about 5px of vertical cord segment
directly above the inlet.Also, I've never seen you complain about any of the ASCII art on the
this list, which often (surely more than 5% of the time) uses "-"
and "|" at 90-degree angles and "+" to make segmented patch cords.-Jonathan
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at; To: Marco Donnarumma devel@thesaddj.com; Cc: pd-list@iem.at; Subject: Re: [PD] FLOSS book Lists chapter Sent: Sat, Feb 19, 2011 6:48:10 PM
On Feb 19, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Marco Donnarumma wrote:
This made me think of a help to revealing (2). If an interface were to have hover-over tooltips, as has been discussed at times for outlets/inlets, then a cable could reveal its creation order on hover.
It wouldn't obviate triggers, but would make a nice debugging feature.
+1
I don't think the connection order should be exposed. I really
think that the GUI should not encourage bad programming practice.
Its also this same reason why I think that 95% of the time,
segmented patch cords are bad.But yes, tooltips showing what messages an inlet expects would be
great to have. Check out the l2ork distro for the new version of
J.Sarlo's magic glass cord inspector..hc
http://at.or.at/hans/
I hate it when they say, "He gave his life for his country." Nobody
gives their life for anything. We steal the lives of these kids. -
Admiral Gene LeRocque