IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
julien.breval@tremplin-utc.net wrote:
I use 64 or 128 samples, with 2 periods (I can't change this latter one actually) Latency is 2.9 ms (64 smp) or 5.38 ms (128 smp)
when you set the samples/period-value to something like 64 you will *not* get a latency of 64 samples.
of course i was assuming non-sense here too, as you would expect 2*64=128 samples latency in such a case. still the real values are far worse.
mfg.as.dr IOhannes