Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, vibronik@laposte.net wrote:
From what i understood, i should use Pd+GEM to achieve my goal. But in GEM documentation, i only found "pixel_blur", which looks irrelevant.
Feel free to ask me any question, maybe what i explained is not clear enough, or you need extra informations.
Well, it would be clearer if anyone of us knew why [pix_blur] is irrelevant.
[pix_blur] is "irrelevant" as it was a misnomer and is now more correctly called [pix_motionblur]. i don't know whether this is the reason why tristan refers to it as being "irrelevant". Gem's documentation calls it "deprecated".
I'm quite experienced in Linux, opensource software, and electronics ; so don't fear to get into tech things.
Well, if you want to apply any amount of blur, of any shape of blur, in always the same amount of time, there's only one way that I know about, and it's using Fourier transforms.
or convolution which is just the same.
fgmasdr IOhannes