(i remember having troubles with those functions on other
compilers...but it's been years :-)) Presently it fails to compile under OSX. It's a fairly recent mac air-- I don't have the specs atm but I'll check and post later. -Jonathan
On Saturday, February 20, 2016 2:36 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig@iem.at> wrote:
On 02/19/2016 09:37 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
Hi List, Line 593 of pdp_imageproc_portable.c: /* affine x, y mappings in screen coordinates */ double mapx(double _x, double _y){return cx + izx * ( c * (_x-cx) + s * (_y-cy));} double mapy(double _x, double _y){return cy + izy * (-s * (_x-cx) + c * (_y-cy));}
These lines are found _inside_ a function called pdp_imageproc_resample_affinemap_process.
there's nothing (much) wrong with it: nested functions are a gcc extension. (i remember having troubles with those functions on other compilers...but it's been years :-))
It's fun to focus on the substring "portable.c", and just read these lines a few times. :)
"portable" means different things to different people.
for you it seems to refer to usability on multiple operating-systems and compilers. it could also have referred to the file-size (pdp_imageproc_portable.c easily fits on a floppy). knowing tom a bit, it's most likely that this is about portability between multiple architectures all running linux (and looking at the other files nearby this is very much the case - as the "portable" code is opposed to code explictely using i586 instructions)
gmasrd IOhannes
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list