how would that work, martin?
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Martin Peach martin.peach@sympatico.cawrote:
Wouldn't it be a good idea to settle on a graphics metalanguage rather than translating tcl code to qt or whatever?
Martin
On 2013-01-21 15:11, Leandro da Mota Damasceno wrote:
so let's see...Who´s working with what so far?
I´d love to join a team and start learning how to code with one of the toolkits.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at mailto:hans@at.or.at> wrote:
So all those interested in a new GUI should start working on it, there is lots of interest. Then we can incrementally change pd itself as there is a need. .hc On 01/21/2013 02:48 PM, Leandro da Mota Damasceno wrote: > You're right. Damn, you're always right :) > > So, just to know where we are right now... What have beentested/done > regarding the GUIs toolkits so far? I think we should at least have this > set and go on from there... > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at mailto:hans@at.or.at>wrote:
> >> >> I think this is the general idea of what everyone wants to support. But >> the >> way is actually takes shape is going to depend on whoever actually does the >> work. A great example of this is the PDDP (Pure Data Documentation >> Project). >> We had lots of design meetings and then no one implemented the ideas. Then >> Jonathan picked up from that what was interesting to him and made the whole >> meta help system, the search plugin, etc. >> >> The lesson there for me is that big design discussions only work if the >> people >> involved them are willing to do the work to implement them. Instead, I >> think >> for a more decentralized community like this one, we only should nail down >> the >> key parts that everyone must use, then leave other decisions to those who >> are >> implementing those parts. >> >> So that means I'm happy to help people write there own GUI, andI'll >> definitely be involved in the work of making it possible with Pd. >> >> .hc >> >> On 01/21/2013 01:05 PM, Leandro da Mota Damasceno wrote: >>> That sounded like a Lego approach. :) >>> >>> So the way I see it the GUI development should be in the most seemless >> way >>> for the user, right? >>> >>> And we also have the problem between people who prefer a simple, leaner >> GUI >>> approach (the classic PD, for instance) against people who prefer a more >>> sofisticated, and sexy GUI. And I believe both groups would also like >> some >>> more knobs and stuff... >>> >>> so basically, we should at least have two options of gui: simple >> (classic) >>> or sophisticated (sexy). But it would be cool to make it open enough to >>> anyone develop their own or come up with new and customized ones. that >>> would make PD way cooler than Max/MSP or anything else. So for that to >> work >>> (and now I must admit I really don't know the architecture behind this >> part >>> of PD, so maybe it is already this way), the comunication between the GUI >>> and the rest of PD should be kept simple, fast and modulated, working >> with >>> the leanest possible API. I also think this is a good approach >> considering >>> that most of these toolkits will stop getting support way before PD >> ceases >>> to exist. I have also thought about the possibility of skins, but then >>> loading a bunch of bitmaps would not help in terms of performance... >>> >>> >>> At the same time we pick a toolkit and focus on that one first. So we >>> should think of at least two teems, right? One at the GUI end and the >> other >>> at the core PD end... >>> >>> What do you guys think? >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at mailto:hans@at.or.at
>>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 01/21/2013 12:54 AM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> >>>>>> From: Billy Stiltner <billy.stiltner@gmail.com <mailto:billy.stiltner@gmail.**com <billy.stiltner@gmail.com>>> >>>>>> To: IOhannes zmölnig <zmoelnig@iem.at <mailto:zmoelnig@iem.at>>>>>> Cc: pd-list@iem.at <mailto:pd-list@iem.at> >>>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 10:04 PM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [PD] GUI toolkits and custom GUIs WAS: Integra Live 1.5 >>>> released >>>>>> >>>>>> haha , last month i tried to install juce to see about makingan >>>>>> alternate graphics front end to my patches. there was some weirdness >>>>>> in the way you compile it then run the introjucer or somethin to >>>>>> update it then after the update something didn't quite work right. >>>>>> then there are all the old projects that use the old steinberg vst sdk >>>>>> which you cant get from steinberg anymore so all that is just awful. i >>>>>> think that there should be a really nice updated version of juce >>>>>> either available now or in the near future. its a tossup between >>>>>> fltk, qt , opengl ,juce, and processing. i just want to be able to >>>>>> add my waveform data filenames to the presets with a fileopen dialog >>>>>> without using an external, string parsing like .scl files that have >>>>>> 100.00 or 3/2, and polyphonic patchcords would be nice. >>>>> >>>>> What about the -guicmd "cmd..." flag? Could one write a pd-gui.html >>>>> that lives at localhost:1234, and have it talk to pd at its port on >>>> localhost? >>>>> >>>>> Then you could just write the interface with html5 canvas, svg, >>>>> javascript, or whatever. >>>>> >>>>> -Jonathan >>>> >>>> >>>> That sounds feasible to me. >>>> >>>> .hc >>>> >>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>> Pd-list@iem.at mailto:Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>>> http://lists.puredata.info/**listinfo/pd-list<http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list> >>>> >>> >> >______________________________**_________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/** listinfo/pd-list http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list