21 Jun
2006
21 Jun
'06
4:48 p.m.
Le 21 Juin 2006 09:55, Tim Blechmann a écrit :
Just like a patch using [expr] does not contains a copy of [expr].
loading expr could be interpreted as binding to facilities: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#TOCIfInterpreterIsGPL
But the binding occurs between [expr] and Pd, not between a patch using [expr] and [expr]. A patch is a document; it can ask the original [expr] or a different [expr] to interpret "1+1". -- Marc