21 Jun
2006
21 Jun
'06
3:55 p.m.
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 09:24 -0400, Marc Lavallée wrote:
work. A picture retouched with the Gimp is a derivative work of
the
original picture, not of the Gimp.
It's not a suitable analogy because the picture doesn't contain a
copy of
the Gimp.
Just like a patch using [expr] does not contains a copy of [expr].
loading expr could be interpreted as binding to facilities: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#TOCIfInterpreterIsGPL
t
-- tim@klingt.org ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk
I must say I find television very educational. The minute somebody turns it on, I go to the library and read a good book. Groucho Marx