You're right-- the creator's intentions don't matter here, that's beside the point.
-Jonathan
--- On Wed, 6/22/11, Charles Henry czhenry@gmail.com wrote:
From: Charles Henry czhenry@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PD] [OT] technological parody was: Pd performance at TED To: "Jonathan Wilkes" jancsika@yahoo.com, pd-list@iem.at Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2011, 11:33 PM
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
The Rube Goldberg machines and the fridge are great examples of parodies-- I suppose we can call them technological parodies if we want to be precise. But for things that are not actually meant as parodies, it's a misnomer that just seems like an ideological term of derision.
Correct. It's a kids game, I know... and it works as intended. Yes--I am deriding it even though I probably don't have to.
so, I guess you mean to say that a *real* parody has to be intentional? I doubt the creators of the robotic beer fridge thought they were creating a parody--but the sheer impracticality and high-technology implementation *makes* it one.
So, calling *anything* a "technological parody" is as you said, just an ideological term of derision. But after all, you can create anything you want, it depends on how it's received by other people what labels they would put on it.