Hi,
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 06:03:34AM -0400, Dan Wilcox wrote:
I think this has been asked before, but why isn't sssad included in pd-extended? It's stable and I've been using it for quite some time and I know its getting plenty of use in rjlib.
Apart from being packaged as its own Debian package (which is a new requirement) it fulfills all requirements for pd-x-inclusion listed on the puredata.info page.
Maybe the question should better be: Why was sssad removed from pd-extended after 0.41 and still is? My inquiries regarding the reasons like http://www.mail-archive.com/pd-list@iem.at/msg35153.html haven't been answered. I can live with that, it's well known that I don't use pd-x (things like the sssad-issue are only reinforcing this decision), but I know, that many people would love to use sssad or already do but hate it when they have to install a single-object library manually into their pd-extended install.
PS: Thanks 12848492048 times over Frank.
12848492048 welcomes! :)
Ciao
Frank