11 Apr
2006
11 Apr
'06
3:11 p.m.
G Quested wrote:
I kept getting stack overflow with my first attempt because my array was too large so i had to put a delay into the circuit. Is this a reasonable workaround or is there a better way?
no, the workaround is not reasonable.
why not using a "real" counter (as found in doc/02.control.examples/05.counter) combined with an [until]? this way you get an iterative counter instead of a recursive one, which would allow you to use big arrays (>200 :-)) without stack overflows with the additional benefit that it happens in logical null-time.
mfg.asd.r IOhannes