Hallo, Peter Todd hat gesagt: // Peter Todd wrote:
That sounds reasonable. Nonetheless, the only time a user is required to write the [s something]s, is when they explicitly want to control things in a different way (and they can 'send' with messages, rather than [s]) - again, not so different from rradical?
You're right, this is actually quite similar.
By this, I presume you mean that there is an OSCroute created outside each actual rradical abstraction subsequently connected to the OSC inlet? That seems to make most sense.
Actually there are OSCroute's *inside* each rrad-abstraction. Think:
[inlet] | [route $1] | [route /freq /vol /pan ...] | [s $0-freq] ...
Actually this is hidden inside auxiliary abstractions: "originator" and "commun".
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__