thanks jamie, you have made me feel so much better
On Jun 8, 2005, at 12:19 PM, james tittle wrote:
On Jun 8, 2005, at 7:52 AM, Miller Puckette wrote:
The "cos~" problem I should have anticipated... if we're in MacOSX, the code assumes big-endian... I think. Proably the __FreeBSD_ test could also include MAXOSX, assuming it defines the constants BYTE_ORDER and LITTLE_ENDIAN in a unix-ish way...
...yep, I checked for the __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ and it is defined, so we should got with that kind of check...of course it also has the expected __SSE__, __SSE2__, i386, __i386, blahblahblah...I still feel strange seeing that on a mac :-) But it's certainly another testament to the portability of pd!
jamie
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Patrick Pagano, B.S., M.F.A Digital Media Specialist University of Floirda Digital Worlds Institute 352-294-2082