I haven't tried this (and can't on this computer), but it occurred to me you may want to see what happens if you put the [pipe 0] directly after the [loadbang] (before the trigger). [pipe] and [delay] should always make a break in logic flow, right?
Matt
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks, Matt.
I also see that I overlooked a previous thread about this very issue. I guess I shouldn't make a bug tracker entry since it's not clear whether this is desired behavior or not, but I'm curious: does anyone desire this behavior? It just seems obscure that loadbang would bang but disable (non-[pipe]ed) outlets.
-Jonathan
--- On Fri, 4/10/09, Matt Barber brbrofsvl@gmail.com wrote:
From: Matt Barber brbrofsvl@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PD] Creation Argument Weirdness To: pd-list@iem.at, "Jonathan Wilkes" jancsika@yahoo.com Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 4:34 AM
Hi, I think I may have found a bug. After changing the
abstraction
argument, nothing comes out of the outlet to the
parent patch. I'm on
windows; can someone confirm before I post it on the
bug tracker?
Same over here. As a very limited hack, you can throw a [pipe 0] in, but dataflow ordering gets screwed up. See attached.
M