Am 15.07.2009 um 11:05 schrieb cyrille henry:
Max a écrit :
Am 14.07.2009 um 21:19 schrieb Martin Schied:
@Frank: Thanks for that suggestion but I couldn't find mails in
the list saying that pd~ did the job for Max Neupert. In fact his
only mail I could find was about pd~ not working some time ago..?it does work nicely. i think it's the way how to split audio and
video in two separate processes to avoid interference.no, it will not avoid interference. it's the way to go if you have a dual core computer and wish do
dedicated 1 core for the audio, and 1 core (+ GPU) for the images
rendering. but since the 2 pd instance are synchronised at audio rate, if the
video processing is using more then 100% of a CPU, then it will slow
down both pd instance and you should then ear click on the audio.
true. to avoid that slow down the framerate dynamically if cpu usage
is approaching 100% in the rendering process.
to avoid interference, you should use 2 pd, and connect them via
netsend.
that did the job but there are some difficulties with that approach:
if an instance with netserver crashes the port will be blocked for
some time.
max