Sounds great!
Two more things I noticed in the test version:
Pd sporadically crashes really hard when opening help patches... Can't reproduce it. I'm on Win 7.
There's a object called [framp~] (just discovered that it's been there earlier, but I wasn't aware of it). In the 'list of objects' aka help-intro-pd it is described as "output a ramp for each block", but actually it does something completely different ;-). I'm still figuring out how to read/interprete the analysis data. Anyway, the help patch says: "A sinusoidal component should appear in four components (or three in the special case of a sinusoid exactly tuned to a bin." That's not what I get... For feeding fractional bin frequencies I sometimes get 2, 3 or even 5 components. And for non-fractional bin frequencies I hardly ever get 3 components, on the contrary, the output is quite messy, with lots of tiny values (rounding errors because of Pd's 6 digit float precision? imperfection of [osc~]?). Just something I noticed.
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. April 2016 um 22:08 Uhr Von: "Miller Puckette" msp@ucsd.edu An: "Christof Ressi" christof.ressi@gmx.at Cc: pd-list@iem.at, "Miller Puckette" mpuckett@imusic1.ucsd.edu Betreff: Re: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.47-0 test 1 released
I want to do this but have 3 or more conflicting ideas right now how to do it... so can't decide :)
M
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 01:49:49PM +0200, Christof Ressi wrote:
Thanks a lot! [clone] is a really awesome feature!
I also like the new 'delete' method for [text]. Very nice!
Just one question: Are there any plans to get rid of some deep copying in the code for [list]? Some month ago we had a discussion about iterating through lists in Pd and how it's not possible in linear time in pure vanilla style (at least not in a trivial way, think of the [list-drip] abstraction). You kind of made a hint that you might revise the code in a future release. I'm just curious if this is something we could expect. I checked and the 'naive' style with two [list split] objects still behaves kind of exponentially. Generally I find it a bit curious that in Pd one needs to split a list twice (with all the copying involved) just to retrieve a single item. Have you thought of implementing something like an 'iterate' method (I think I even saw this in one of your to-do-lists) or even getter/setter methods, like in [text] and [array]?
Thanks a again for the release!
Gesendet: Samstag, 23. April 2016 um 20:27 Uhr Von: "Miller Puckette" msp@ucsd.edu An: pd-announce@iem.at Betreff: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.47-0 test 1 released
To Pd-announce:
Pd version 0.47-0 test 1 is available on http://msp.ucsd.edu/software.htm or via git from sourceforge: git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/pure-data/pure-data
I'm still fixing bugs but the major changes are in place: a "clone" object for making voice banks etc., and a "zoom" feature for people whose high-resolution displays make Pd's windows microscopically small. (Also, setting the Pd window font size now extends to menus and dialogs).
cheers Miller
Pd-announce mailing list Pd-announce@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-announce _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list