Sorry just double checking something András... there's no rt kernel for 64 bits Ubuntu? (or you're saying for the lucid lynx?)
Cause karmic koala has rt, I have Ubuntu Studio 64 bits with rt [1]
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/9.10release_notes
2010/9/13 András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com
Ahh, livna.... You know, know that i have convinced my Fedora friends to switch to Ubuntu, what do I tall them when i go back? :o) I'll take a look at it, and also at home-brewing a kernel. Maybe that's the way forward.
Thanks, Andras
2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com
Then you have to add Fusion free+non-free (maybe livna?) to your repos.
2010/9/13 András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com:
Hhh, switching distro seems harder than moving to another country sometimes... :o) I heard that some non-free stuff if missing from Fedora, does CCRMA have these? Like some proprietary codecs, etc...
2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com
yes, planet_ccrma is a repo for the Fedora/CentOS/RedHat family I like it
2010/9/13 András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com:
Hmm, hmm. That means switching to Fedora, right?
2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com
Planet CCRMA offers rt-kernel for x86_64 systems. Give it a try.
2010/9/13 András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, jm jones juanmjv@gmail.com
wrote:
>> >> Hi, usually I install the 64 bits version of, but the last time,
I
>> dont remember why : ) (maybe to avoid any problems) I installed
the
>> 32 >> bits version of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. Is a repo of pd-extended for
10.04
>> available? >> And about the 32 vs 64 bits, what are your choices? And what
about
>> distros? Pure:dyne seems more lightweight with his xfce desktop, >> however I have a good processor (core 2 duo intel e7200) and 2gb
of
>> ram, planning an update to 6gb, so I dont know if xfce is a must
for
>> me. >> Im a "veteran" gnu/linux user, but the last years I was using OS
X
>> and >> W7 for music making. In Linux I want to use pd, Renoise (its >> available >> as 64 bits too), and wine for some vsts. >> > > Hi There, > > I'm sort of a veteran too (started on IBM AIX in 1992, used Red
Hat
> for > a > long time, then went back to Windows 98, later XP, which i gave up > finally a > few years ago). > I'm using vanilla Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit with Gnome (and 2GB of
memory),
> and my > impression is that it's not the WM that makes things slow, but in
the
> case > of Pd, it's Pd itself. Read the archives on GUI<->core
communication
> and > Tcl/Tk weirdnesses. The 64-bit version of Pd is quite tidy now,
well
> actually there was a time when it seemed to me a bit slower than
the
> 32-bit > version, but AFAIK there's no reason for that any more (?) > With a decent CPU and that huge amount of RAM you (will) have, it > really > cannot be a question of WM whatsoever. Of course, the system has
to
> be > tuned > for realtime, undisturbed audio usage, which may include getting
rid
> of > eye-candy functions, but i never experienced a problem with those. > After > all, they use openGL, don't they? > The same stands for pure:dyne; at the core it's a linux kernel,
and
> what > you > install on (or remove from) the top, it's up to you. > The only thing i'm missing here on 64-bit is the RT kernel. Once i > find > a > nice quick way, i'll grab it, but i'm not really into home-brewing
my
> kernel. :) >
-- Muranyi Andras
-- Muranyi Andras
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list