18 Mar
2007
18 Mar
'07
7:16 p.m.
On 18/03/2007, at 11.37, Derek Holzer wrote:
I've had several students on both windows and OS X that had trouble
with the [>~] object for various reasons. It can be replaced with
[expr~ $v1 > $v2], which is what the [>~] abstraction uses.
I saw that in the help patch for the abstraction. That help patches
says also that "you *cannot* use arguments with this version, like
[>~ 2.7]". Now i wonder if there is are Pd-technicalities that limits
to such behavior, since it's not implemented?