A better model for the libs would be just to have packages, spreading the effort between people to maintain each package. And leaving space to develop the pd-core/pd-gut themselves. Don't you think? Maybe I'm missing something.
I didn't know about the incompatibility of BSD and GPL. This happens with all versions of BSD?
Mathieu, maybe we need a new project called PureFlow? :-)
2010/10/1 Mathieu Bouchard matju@artengine.ca:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Pedro Lopes wrote:
Then its all about reconnecting pd with these "more friendly GUI features". Even if they don't make it to vanilla, why not extended?
pd-extended is only for the things Hans wants, and if it's not something that is expected to go in vanilla, it better be damn important, to justify maintaining a long-term difference between extended and vanilla.
I've heard Hans say that he can't use DesireData code because it's licensed under the GPL. Pd-extended is also said to be licensed under the GPL, but the pd core section of it comes with Miller's BSD notice, and any contributions to vanilla need to be under the BSD. However, in all those years, Hans never asked me whether relicensing any piece of it would be a possibility, so I think that the license issue is just a façade for another issue.
_______________________________________________________________________ | Mathieu Bouchard ------------------------------ Villeray, Montréal, QC _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list