I don't know why [expr~] is usually not considered vanilla
Maybe because it lives in extra/ instead of src/ ?
What is extra/ there for, by the way? I remember it being mentioned in msp's paper that introduced [pd~], but not sure why it is still there. Giulio
From: Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com To: "pd-list@lists.iem.at" pd-list@lists.iem.at Sent: Monday, 6 February 2017, 17:13 Subject: Re: [PD] test audio signals: Are there <~ and >~ objects?
2017-02-06 11:00 GMT-02:00 Peter P. peterparker@fastmail.com: Thanks IOhannes and Roman! Funny there are no internal objects for this.
best, P
[expr~] is an internal
2017-02-06 11:11 GMT-02:00 cyrille henry ch@chnry.net: for a vanilla only solution, you can use tabread~ with a 2 point table...
I don't know why [expr~] is usually not considered vanilla
the vanilla solution is with [expr~], which is an internal in vanilla
cheers
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list