I may want to change the cutoff very fast, with big jumps
hmm, this is worrying then. Are there not any low-pass or high-pass filters in the latest iemlib that take signal inputs for the cutoff freqs? I'm sorry, I haven't got Pd here at work, so I can't check. But I must say I HAVE noticed clicks even using the control (ie. non signal) version of [line]. I think my block size was 64, but whatever this value is the output from [line] will always be a significant jump compared to using [line~] - unless you make the [line] change REALLY slowly of course! Good luck
Matt
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- http://www.loopit.org/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ----- Original Message ----- From: julien.breval@tremplin-utc.net To: "CK" x@meta.lo-res.org Cc: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 10:01 AM Subject: Re: [PD] [dumb] question about [lop~] and [hip~]
Selon CK x@meta.lo-res.org:
I read: . .
[vcf~]). So, do I need to add a [line] object between this frequency parameter and the controlling interface (basically a time-jumping
number),
for the filter
depends on how fast you plan to change the value (or have big jumps), in short, since I don't think [lop~] does any inernal smoothing I guess it
i
won't hurt.
I may want to change the cutoff very fast, with big jumps. Indeed, I'm
making a
new filter for a granular synthesis patch, and this filter is based on
several
[lop~] and [hip~] filters.
I think I will add a [line] with a variable time resolution