7 Feb
2008
7 Feb
'08
3:58 a.m.
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:19PM +0000, Andy Farnell wrote:
As I see, the unipolar vacuum collapse theory only makes sense, if there is a chemical reaction that removes CO2, H2O, O2 or N2 from the atmosphere, (and one assumes no matter is transformed to energy) - well NO2 and O3 are produced, but that doesn't account for the volume.
Really? I'm not so sure about that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminesence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistol_shrimp http://youtube.com/results?search_query=pistol+shrimp&search_type=&search=Search
Chris.