Re: [ot] website tools [was: Re: Re[2]: [PD] pure-data.org]

-- | |ciao | |might run into problems finding a decent ISP. |fine with me. I'd probably prefer Zope but with Zope or Webware, we |So if enough people are found for a PHP solution, that's absoluetly | |language (that currently is useless inside Pd). |the future CMS is PHP, because I don't have time to learn another |direction. I just won't be of much help with the technical side, if |But I don't want to push things for a pure-data.org 2.0 in a certain | |that is. Webware has a great share of Java converts on board. |way" while I see Zope often doing things "the Zope way", whatever |to Zope and is written with a strong focus on doing things "the Python |doesn't always have to be Zope. Webware is very lightweight compared |You really should take a look into Webware then (webware.sf.net). It | |> pants) |> (since Python is my bag and I'd like to get into its web-publishing |> Just my 2p. I would be willing to help with a Python portal solution |> |> author/contribute. As simple as that. |> and PDF docs from simple XML, which anyone would be able to |> Forrest. For example, it has TODO and FAQ DTD's, and generates printable |> For documentation, however, I have yet to see anything as comprehensive as |> |> the short term and more inclusive. |> learn it, etc. However, a Python portal solution seems quicker, easier in |> that, I believe it would do the job provided there were people willing to |> swiss banks, vodafone, etc.). Personally, because I've seen it work like |> of them. It is being used in severe load-balancing situations (a couple of |> Yes, most are. Cocoon is no different, but is the fastest and most mature | |David Casal hat gesagt: // David Casal wrote: |Hallo, [Frank Barknecht]->[[ot] website tools [was: Re: Re[2]: [PD]...