Hallo, Steffen Juul hat gesagt: // Steffen Juul wrote:
This is what i did for testing:
Made a folder in extra called test. In that i made an abstraction
called testing.pd which was just a wrapper around a [print].Then i made a new test patch which as: [declare -stdpath extra/test] [testing]
Okay, here's another test you could do to find out where declare tries to add the stdpath
Make a patch with [declare -stdpath funkypathname] or another unique name you definitely know doesn't exist, then load it while Pd was started with "-verbose". Try to create an unknown object like [unknown] and search for "funkypathname" in Pd's error output.
Btw.: When doing this on Linux with a testpatch in "/tmp/funkytest.pd" my Pd searches for [unknown] give only /tmp/funkypathname/ as possible results with the funky pathname, which is wrong: according to the docs, -stdpath should search relative to the Pd binary, not relative to the path, which is what [declare -path ...] should do. Looks like another [declare]-bug. (Maybe already reported?)
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__