7 Oct
2004
7 Oct
'04
3:37 p.m.
Matju wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
[expr] has to parse the expression, which is costy.
Hi, the [expr] object does the parsing once, at object construction time, so I would like to know why you say that.
right, probably you caught me talking nonsense. i have to admit that i never really looked at the expr-code, but my feeling told me, that it should not be faster than regular objects.
anyhow, i don't like the [expr] because *often* it makes things so less readable (in my opinion [expr $f * 3.14159 / 180] is less readable than the use of [* 3.14159] and [/ 180])
apol.
mfg.as.aer IOhannes