Hi,
hm, not sure whether this really is the same bug. On the machine where I originally discovered the problem (intel atom processor, Ubuntu 10.04, pd-0.42.5-extended-rc5), the arraybug.pd patch by hcs doesn't update the array graph correctly, no matter whether "hide object..." is checked or not.
On another machine (intel core2 processor, Ubuntu 10.04, pd-0.42.5-extended-20100105), the arraybug.pd patch updates the array graph correctly all the time! Moreover, I can't reproduce the problem I was describing in my post on this machine!
So, it seems to be machine-dependent? Very strange.
Best regards, Matthias
On 08/30/2010 07:55 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey Matthis,
It sounds like you are describing this bug:
donecanvasdialog stops arrays from redrawing until reload http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3052388&group_id=557...
If so, could you add your experience and your patch to the bug report? If you log in before, then you'll be automatiaclly emailed when the bug report status changes.
.hc
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:46 +0200, Matthias Blau wrote:
Hi list,
I am about to update PureMeasurement and have just run into the following problem (see the attached patch pm_fftanalyzer_2ch.pd): The patch itself works for me. However, if I just change the size of the graphs associated with $0-testsignal or $0-magnitude, then those arrays will get redrawn from time to time, but not in a reliable manner any more. For instance, changing the magnitude display to S11 or S22 (and perhaps back to FRF:2re1) will eventually freeze the graph.
Could anyone explain this behavior? Is the only solution to leave it as it is and not to touch it?
If that matters, it happens on 0.42.5-extended-rc5 under Ubuntu 10.04.
Thanks for your help, Matthias _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list