Hallo, Enrique Erne hat gesagt: // Enrique Erne wrote:
i now removed my system (with r and s) and replaced it with the singleton's method with [value]. good thing it now has the same name as before ($1.SSSAD.req).
i repeated my test 1 - 3 from before. it seems all correct.
additionally i created a new [sssad key] "on the fly". this one has now thanks to the original method (of singleton) no initial first setting. ...but if created "on the fly" it does not have the correct content. -->but the original sssad has the same problem afaik.
attached is the the latest sssad, please test.
Thanks a lot. This looks good in my quick test and also more simple and elegant than the dynamic patching (which I wasn't too happy with anyway). I'll do some more tests after work, but it seems now all is as with singleton and if it indeed is, I'd like to include your change.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__