It says grub 0.97-29ubuntu60 (Legacy version) grub-common 1.98-1ubuntu6 Afaik Ubuntu Studio is a whole lotta different dependency tree.
Andras
2010/7/1 Pedro Lopes pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt
Nop, from karmic (9.10) up its grub2, the thing its a bit odd but 1.97~beta4 is actually grub2[1]. Or a more trusted source [2] - see that it reads grub2 bellow:
grub2 (1.97~beta4-1ubuntu4))
[1] http://movingtowardslinux.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/installing-windows-and-li...
[2] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/1.97~beta4-1ubuntu4https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/1.97%7Ebeta4-1ubuntu4
2010/6/30 András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com
Thanks all!
I'm with (stupid:) Ubuntu, vanilla... so my kernel is not rt by default, i suppose. Will take a look at this patching thing... (before i thought it's the source you have to patch...)
As for grub, it seems grub2 comes with a fresh Lucid install but my old grub just survived the upgrade (bet i'm glad)
Andras
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Pedro Lopes pedro.lopes@ist.utl.ptwrote:
Easier than messing with grub2 new commands...
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Kim Cascone kim@anechoicmedia.comwrote:
also, if you want a quick and easy way to switch kernels for testing: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/StartUpManager