Re: [PD] zexy 2.0 without [nop]

Hi Roman, IOhannes,

me and friends of mine used [nop] sometimes just for cosmetical reasons.

More than "cosmetical", [nop~] is employed in the use of [limiter~] as a way of delaying the signal one sample block. This makes the new Zexy reverse-incompatible with its own help files for another object, as well as any patches out there using [limiter~] as the help files would suggest you to.

d.

Roman Haefeli wrote:

hi

me and friends of mine used [nop] sometimes just for cosmetical reasons. now i found out that it has been dropped from zexy. is there a reason to drop an object when it's already introduced? i mean, it's _not_ that difficult to change the patches, so it's not a big deal, but i think [nop] didn't "disturb" the library, or did it?