22 Jun
2009
22 Jun
'09
8:56 a.m.
Max wrote:
great. now i get iohannes' irony.
it really wasn't irony (but of course it only makes sense if you knew that [pix_buffer_filmopen] is implemented as an abstraction): if you do have a modified patch of pix_buffer_filmopen and want it to be included into upcoming releases, please post it to the patch-tracker at http://sf.net/prjects/pd-gem
fgamsdr IOhannes