Hi!
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Peter Plessas hat gesagt: // Peter Plessas wrote:
i somehow assumed, that [writesf~] doesn't use scheduled messages...
I always thought that Pd would execute messages in between audio blocks.
So if i sent two messages (stop old file, start new file), i expected
them to happen in a gap between two blocks, hence gapless recorded files
possible. Franks demonstration shows that i have to explicitly time
those messages according to a block~ (or equivalent) in order to get
this behavior. Still all blurry to me, let's look on!Acutally I found that my patch also works without explicit block timing: Just replace the [pd blockbang~] subpatch with [bang] and see for yourself. However it fails if you try to record less than one block.
Yes, that seems to work for me too! But, can you test it with stereo [writesf~ 2] files? I get clicks on those ones.
thanks for helping out!
regards, PP
Ciao