On 2010-12-14 05:58, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Pd doesn't really have classes like OOP (i.e. no inheritance), so I
as a matter of fact Pd implements a simple OOP system in C (including rudimentary inheritance).
think it can be confusing to use that term.
so i think that we should use the term
People have been saying objects for a long time with Pd and Max.
which doesn't make it any better. people have been saying "objects" for a long time in OOP, and you could use this very definition for Pd/Max like "objects" as well: it's the little rectangle things in your Pd-patch.
iirc, this has all been discussed to the end, and since then the term "objectclass" has been pretty much established for what matju refers to as "class" right now.
fgmasdr IOhannes