Hallo, Javier Garcia hat gesagt: // Javier Garcia wrote:
Thanks Cyrille
Cyrille Henry wrote:
certainly a missong trigger problem.
I dont understand...could you correct my patch?
why do you nead a delay?
As you can see here i asked for something similar some days ago:
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-10/055664.html
and [delay< worked. (The patch i refered is attached on this mail)
A [trigger anything] would have worked there as well. Both of your patches have a tricky execution order and you did get the order wrong. To get execution order right, you should not use [delay] but [trigger]. You should only use [delay] when you actually want to delay something not to fix execution order problems (except in some very rare cases.)
Anyway looping from 0-1 is just a variation on counting, which doesn't need triggers or delays. There are standard idioms on how to do counters in Pd (search the archive). I'd recommend to only count in integer numbers and scale to your needed range afterwards. See attached patch which is your patch changed in small steps.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__