I am curious, has anyone ever vandalized the netpd patches during a jam?
~Kyle
On 6/19/07, Roman Haefeli reduzierer@yahoo.de wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 19:33 +0200, Steffen wrote:
The "x.x.x"-system might be nice. How do you use it? Keep the first x=0 at all times as no code gets to version 1; bumb the second x when new features are added; bumb the last x when bugs are corrected? -
yo, that is how i use them. but the main reason, why netpd uses it, is a purely technical one: patches and abstractions are shared between netpd clients. in order to make sure, that changes made to a patch or abstraction get to the other netpd clients as well, this versioning system was introduced. when loading a patch with creator, the version is checked by creator and compared with the version of the same patch on the other clients. if the patch to be opened has a higher version number than the on the other clients, the patch is uploaded instead of only opened, so that the patch on the other clients is overwritten.
Such info one how the version numbers makes sense is nice to add in a README, i think.
hm, since - as frank stated - a version number is not essential, i'd say, it wouldn't do it into the readme.
roman
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list