On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 05:01 -0700, Derek Kwan wrote:
For me, I can't count how many times I had to add a [$0], or a pack or some extra workaround before a message so that I could send messages to my variables (I hardly use variables without a $0).
Joao
I do face this too where I use $0 with all my [v]s and [s]s and [r]s and it does get to be a bit tedious BUT I'm not quite sure if mixing the two worlds and their rules are worth it...
Yeah! Ideally, there would be two different prefixes for message expansion and creation argument expansion. THEN you could have it convenient, #0 would expand to the message selector, $0 to the implicit ID, $1 to the first creation argument, #1 to the first atom of the incoming message, etc... And everyone would be happy.
I just see no way to go from here to there...
Roman