On 12/23/10 8:51 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 08:10 -0500, Mike Moser-Booth wrote:
[bang~], [edge~], and [threshold~] I've noticed for sure are like this. I don't know about [vline~] since I use it to avoid having to change the block size. :-)
I happily repeat myself: There is no need to adjust the block size when using [vline~].
Yeah, that's what I was trying to say.
As Dietrich already pointed out, for some reason it stops working as expected when using a blocksize< 64. I don't why this is and I suspect it to be a bug.
I don't know, either. I initially just suspected it was because [vline~] still starts outputting its vector at 64 sample boundaries. The attached patch seems to indicate it's a little weirder than that.
I don't understand Pd's code enough to say if it's just reiterating or illustrating Mathieu's point.
.mmb
Roman