On Jun 9, 2007, at 5:45 AM, Enrique Erne wrote:
I am now wondering something: why haven't these awesomely functional netpd object been included as abstractions within Pd-extended?!?!
on one hand i would like to see netpd included in pd-extended, but not on cost of the current package. it is important that netpd and all patches work on linux, osx and windows.
if people start to write netpd patches with pd-extended and use many externals i'm afraid we are going to have instrument that work on one os and maybe not on the other. netpd would also be a great system to find os-specific bugs :-)
This right here outlines the main purpose of Pd-extended: to provide
a tested and reliable package that works the same on all OSes.
Basically, I think you should pick one platform for netpd, and make
sure everything works smoothly on that one. Then worry about the rest.
Alex Quessy and I tried to run the latest version on netpd working
for a network jam last Sunday, we both failed. He got further than
me, he got some sounds out, but neither got it all working. Both of
us know quite a bit about Pd, so I am amazed that newbies get it
going (do they?).
It would very nice if it was just plug and play. It would not be
that hard to do it. I think you could spend a day on it and have it
working smoothly. It would be very worthwhile, but I think you have
already spent far more time trying to help people get it going than
it would take to fix things.
.hc
Yes, would be nice - someone would have to integrate them to pd-extended (using [import] and etc.) ...
are you talking about basic netpd or netpd & all the instruments...
basic netpd is written by Roman Haefeli all the instruments have at least 10 different authors.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said,
hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out
another pink-collar temp pool day. - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf