Hi Kyle,
I thought of doing that, but reconsidered because it seems like it might lead to versioning problems, namespace clashes, multiple copies of objects and possibly, dogs and cats sleeping together.
Or am I over-thinking it?
Phil
Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Hi Phil~
Perhaps you could repackage the polyWaveSynth with the required abstractions included, since they are very small in size to make much of a difference? This might eliminate much of the frustration that seems to be plaguing some people.
~Kyle
On 9/9/07, Frank Barknecht fbar@footils.org wrote:
Hallo, Luigi Rensinghoff hat gesagt: // Luigi Rensinghoff wrote:
i was curious to check out that synth, but i get this error.
the screenshot i from ubuntu, but it was the same on OS X.
You can fix this by adding your polyWaveSynth directory to your pd-path or copy over poly*.pd to that director.y As polypoly.pd lives in a different directory from polyWaveSynth, it cannot find the objects it creates dynamically. (I'm not sure, if it *should* see them, though, i.e. if this is a bug in Pd.)
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list