Mathieu Bouchard escribió:
In some cases some developer (I won't tell the name, but it's someone very important here) was able to find specific bugs and fixed it and published a new release.
I think it's more constructive to say who fixed bugs, even if it's someone who wrote the bugs in the first place. We shouldn't have a culture in which bugs are that much shameful,
Wait wait wait, i'm SORRY for the terrible MISUNDERSTANDING here - well i'd rather call it MISEXPLAINING to place the blame on the right place, which is on me.
The reason why I didn't tell the name wasn't ABSOLUTELY that. That possibility didn't even come up to my mind, and no, I don't consider bugs a shameful thing, not only that much but not even a bit. Also, the part of not telling the name was a kind of a joke since I _thought_ it was clear I was talking about Miller. I didn't "want to" tell the name (facetiously) in order to avoid "setting a precedent" so that every user would start sending Miller crashing patches and expect bug fixes for the next day. When Miller wrote me (publicly in this m/l) to send him a crashing patch (in reply to a message of mine about some bug), he started the message with "It's a dangerous thing to offer, but...".