15 Jan
2007
15 Jan
'07
6:51 a.m.
Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 15:01 +0000, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
When writing it I found a bug in wrap~ in pd-0.40-2 from Miller's site:
sig~ 1 wrap~ print~ -> 0
as i would expect.
sig~ 0 wrap~ print~ -> 1
as i would expect, as well. where is the bug? am i missing something?
wrap~-help says:
----8<---- wrap~ gives the difference between the input and the largest integer not exceeding it (for positive numbers this is the fractional part). ----8<----
largest integer not exceeding 0 is 0, or?
largest integer not exceeding X is X when X is an integer, or?
it makes life simpler when
(x - (wrap~ x)) == x
when x is an integer, as there is no [int~] in Pd.
roman
Claude