hi
i am just trying to understand [hid] and have problems...
well, not real problems, just some remarks on "why are things like this and not different ?" most of them are probably just my way of thinking, but i'd like to learn why i think so differently ...
number (1.10234e+09) which does not seem to change at all (probably pd's range is too small; should i set my hw-clock to 1970 ?)
relatively simple to calculate the relative movement data out of 2 consecutive mouse-posisitions, however it is infinetely harder to get the absolute position out of movement data...
like [rel rel_y 1 1.10234e+09 ( instead of [rel y 1 1.123e+09 ( ? i think if you have a "rel" than everything afterwards will be "relative", so there is no need in having to prepend "rel_" to "y". if you want destinguish between relative and absolute coordinates on a second level, then why is there a first layer at all ?
is there some real reason why the identifier is like "key btn_0" ? i would prefer something like "key 0" with "0" being a real number (why: because pd handles numbers better than symbols in general; you don't pollute the hash-tables with "btn_0" symbols (ok, not that much pollution); it is faster to make floats than symbols; it is very simple to create "btn_0" out of "0", while it is hard to get "1" out of "btn_1" in a generic way)
button-presses; but i do not get which key is pressed: the label is very empty: '')
just my 2 cent
mfg.as.dr IOhannes