Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jun 6, 2008, at 1:34 AM, marius schebella wrote:
Miller Puckette wrote:
Hmm, maybe I need to upload a new PDRP version. I think all the patches I have now use declare "correctly", at least on my machine :)
thanks for answering. I dl pdrp-11 from 10/2007. noanoa was the first one I tested, and it gave me an error, which actually is a bug, but not a declare error. qlist1.txt is not in a subfolder "score" but in the same directory as the main patch
error: score/qlist1.txt: can't open error: score/qlist1.txt: read failed ... you might be able to track this down from the Find menu. the patch also can't create "joystick".
steiger loops misses "system".
manoury jupiter says load_object: Symbol "TABLE_setup" not found
tenney-collage does not find set-line set-line loop1-period ... couldn't create and again it tries to open a file from a score subfolder error: score/reich-qlist.txt: can't open error: score/reich-qlist.txt: read failed ... you might be able to track this down from the Find menu.
so, you are right by saying you use declare correctly, but there are some other bugs still there.
btw. I tested with 0.41-4 on intel mac os x 10.5.3.
I also tested this with a pdx autobuild (0428) and this throws a lot more errors: for example this error (which is strange, since there is also debounce.d_fat and debounce.pd_darwin, same for scofo):
/Users/marius/pd/pdrp/pdrp-11/patch/chowning-stria/../../lib/debounce.d_ppc:
dlopen(/Users/marius/pd/pdrp/pdrp-11/patch/chowning-stria/../../lib/debounce.d_ppc,
10): no suitable image found. Did find: /Users/marius/pd/pdrp/pdrp-11/patch/chowning-stria/../../lib/debounce.d_ppc:
mach-o, but wrong architecture /Users/marius/pd/pdrp/pdrp-11/patch/chowning-stria/../../lib/scofo.d_ppc: dlopen(/Users/marius/pd/pdrp/pdrp-11/patch/chowning-stria/../../lib/scofo.d_ppc,
10): no suitable image found. Did find: /Users/marius/pd/pdrp/pdrp-11/patch/chowning-stria/../../lib/scofo.d_ppc:
mach-o, but wrong architecture scofo ... couldn't create
but that seems to be a pd-extended bug.
Those "no suitable image found" errors mean that the binaries do not include a version for your CPU. I don't know how Pd-extended could help either way.
thanks, the correct version is there, but pdx tries to open the wrong one. there is the d_fat, the d_ppc and the pd_darwin. only the d_fat works, I have to delete d_ppc and d_pd_darwin in order to get the d_fat version loaded. this is different behaviour than with pd-vanilla which picks the right binary.
Try deleting the .d_ppc files or any extra binary files.
yea, that works. thanks, marius.