what OS are you using and what do you mean by 'good'? if good means nice images with little compression artifacts then that suggests a different set of codecs than small file size or fast decompression.
unfortunately i am using winXP and 'good' means nice images and fast decompression ;) the picture quality of cinepak and indeo5 (lil bit better) is quite bad, but both work quite good on my machine. i was just thinking about any other codec that maybe looks better at same performance ...
chr.
--//--ad wolferl: geforce2, 32mb