Sorry for being clumsy.
why? you aren't.
I write off-list since im not sure this is of anyones interest as
such,
why? its a bad idea. now im the bad guy...
i havnt misread anything. just using this "opportunity" to make a little attemp to fish some sound aesthetic related issues up, especially in digital domain. no bite...
I try to be nice, but
clumsy can stop that alright.
didnt expect you'll be so humble... sorry then...
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:38:47 +0100, "Steffen" stffn@dibidut.dk said:
On 23/11/2006, at 18.29, threen wrote:
then what would we be refering to if he didnt. would that be
understood as well and would that change the use of filter technics
in conventional/commercial wayYou lost me.
I just want to correct something. When i said "might be understood by
all" i was just trying to say that what i pointed out, might be a
known, trivial thing, and that the comment on the filters was not
triggered by a miss read of analord to analog.I can just feel, this don't come out right. Basically i was just
trying to make a catch all, such that i didn't necessarily
insinuated that you infact did miss read, as it could well be that
you didn't.Sorry for being clumsy.
I write off-list since im not sure this is of anyones interest as
such, i just wanted you to know what i meant. I try to be nice, but
clumsy can stop that alright.Best, steffen