17 Nov
2007
17 Nov
'07
12:16 a.m.
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 21:14 +0100, zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
Quoting Roman Haefeli reduzierer@yahoo.de:
afaik, [readsf~] is 'stupid' and will always read in the environment's sampling rate. in order to read faster, put [readsf~] in a subpatch together with a [block~ 1 1 64], so that it reads 64 times quicker than at standard sampling rate.
i suggest to use a block-size larger than "1" to get a decent caching
and not spend so much time doing meta-work instead of moving data.[block~ 1024 1 64]
oops, yes.. i actually wanted to write [block~ 64 1 64], but yeah, using a blocksize of 1024 is even better.
roman
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de