4 Apr
2006
4 Apr
'06
11:23 a.m.
On 4/3/06, david golightly davigoli@gmail.com wrote:
See attached patch. Could probably still use a little tweaking, and there's a lower limit on number of crossings per gate, but maybe this is a start.
-david
thats excellent, thanks very much!
the problem was that i couldnt check the current state of the fexpr~ output within the fexpr~ itself, without getting dsp loop errors, or using s~ and r~ and delaying by a block. but it seems obvious now that thats what $y is for..
thanks again.
pete